ऐसी अक्षरे

:- कथा
:- कविता
:- लेख
:- अनुवाद
:- हिंदी
:- English
:- संग्रह
:- इतर

मंदार शिंदे
Mandar Shinde
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Thursday, September 21, 2023

Government School Adoption Scheme

Sharing my views on the recent government decision to allow adoption of government schools by corporates.

According to the Right To Education Act 2009, four types of schools are recognized in India - (1) Schools owned and run by the Government; (2) Schools privately owned but fully or partially funded by the Government; (3) Minority and special schools; (4) Privately owned and self-funded schools.

The corporates and private players already have an option to invest in (and earn from) the education sector under category 2 and category 4 schools. The category 1 schools primarily ensure universal access to elementary education for every child in the country. The government is responsible for making all resources available in category 1 schools.

The recent decision by the state government seems to be the next phase after (i) Voluntary donations by individuals and companies, (ii) Public Private Partnerships, and (iii) Compulsory public contribution (Lok Sahabhag). This will further reduce the stake and say of the government in primary education, along with reducing financial provisions in the budget. This is expected to lead towards costlier (not necessarily better) infrastructure, discrimination and restricted access for children, especially from vulnerable backgrounds, higher dependence on the will and changing interests of the corporates, etc. If you check the contents of the Government Resolution dated 18th September 2023, the corporates are invited to supply everything from chalks to uniforms, textbooks to drinking water, and student counselling to teacher training.

The corporates will be benefitted by the principle of low investment for higher returns, as they will get the land and established school structure (including the goodwill and knowledge base) to project their contribution to the society at a multiplied proportion. For example, a corporate has to invest a huge amount for building and running a private school (under category 4 mentioned above). They can now distribute the same amount to multiple government schools, against which all those schools will be renamed after the corporates with the accountability still remaining with the government.

I feel that corporates should be allowed to build and run schools under category 2 and 4 under the principle of choice of the parents, and the government must run the schools under category 1 under the principle of rights of the people. People in power are trying to sell the public-owned systems for their own and corporates' benefit. This doesn't look good in the present and sounds scary for the future.


Mandar Shinde
21/09/2023



Share/Bookmark

Monday, January 31, 2022

Bridge courses, mental well-being part of state roadmap for learning

Bridge courses, mental well-being part of state roadmap for learning
Jan 31, 2022 | THE TIMES OF INDIA


The focus in the next academic year would not be limited to just improving the fundamental learning objectives of the students, but also helping them with their mental well-being.

While another learning loss survey would be conducted to gauge where the students stand so that a roadmap can be prepared for what more needs to be done to bridge courses as well as for planning extra classes, there would also be programmes to mentor children and help them tide over the two years of gap in offline education they encountered, officials from the education department said.

Apart from this, the state has also planned to reduce drop-out rate and encourage girls’ education by adding standards VIII to XII in neighbourhood schools where classes are only up to Std VII.

The change would be reflected in the textbooks itself as bilingual textbooks are being introduced to improve student engagement and language skills.

“From next year, we will introduce a single textbook formula to reduce the weight of school bags carried by students every day. This will be introduced in Std I from the academic year 2022-23 and will be implemented for all primary classes later. Once the new State Curriculum Framework is designed, work will also be cut out for us to revive the textbooks as per the new Education Policy,” Krishnakumar Patil, director of Maharashtra State Bureau of Textbook Production & Curriculum Research (Balbharati), said.

Unlike this year, when students received the textbooks months after the academic year began, they will be delivered on time, Patil added.

Vikas Garad, deputy director of State Council of Educational Research and Training, said that the next academic year will focus on introducing more co-curricular activities for better interaction between pupil and teachers as well as among pupils. The focus will also be on a robust assessment process, and more emphasis on the mental well-being of the child.

“As you know due to online education, there is limited teacher-pupil interaction and there is almost no peer learning. We are seeing a trend where students are lagging not just in classwise learning objectives, but also behaviourally, there are some drawbacks. Our priority is that in the coming years, we would try to bring things back to normal and in this project, we would also seek help from child psychologists, counsellors, NGOs and interested parties. A school is like a small ecosystem where the student gets to learn life skills too. While academics is a major part of it, so are things like working in a team, accepting failure, helping each other, working with people from different backgrounds and thinking processes which we learn along the way in schools. We also need to inculcate reading habits in them and de-addicted from online devices. We need to make them listen, ask questions, seek answers and so on. So various co-curricular activities are also planned,” Garad said.

Garad said that a learning loss survey would be done to understand the lacunae and accordingly bridge courses would be suggested. With the possibility of another session on online learning, Garad said that classwise, chapter wise videos are also on the cards which will be uploaded on the YouTube channel of SCERT so that every student can access it whenever they want for free.

There will also be a survey on out-of-school children so that proper measures can be taken to bring them back, said Vishal Solanki, commissioner of education.

“Only when the physical schools start regularly will we be able to authentically conduct a survey on out-of-school children. Secondly, we already had discussions with many NGOs and others regarding sex education in schools pre-pandemic. It is important to impart age-appropriate sex education in all schools and efforts would be taken to introduce affective measures. The talks are also on introducing free channels for class I to XII so that students can learn from TV in an audio-visual mode,” Solanki added.

Setting it right

• More focus is required on developing literacy skills, particularly for the students from Std I to III

• Textbooks and other learning material should be made available to all the students on time

• Textbooks and workbooks should have more detailed instructions for self-learning

• Good quality digital content should be designed in the regional language

• Satellite education centres should be started in communities, equipped with digital devices and learning material for children

• Sports, arts and other activities should be encouraged at a community level

• Resources like sports equipment, art and craft material, etc. should be made available at the community level

•Out-of-school children surveys should be carried out more seriously to understand the impacts of pandemic, lockdown, migration, school closure, on education of children, especially girls

- Mandar Shinde, Convenor of Action for Rights of Children



Share/Bookmark

Monday, October 11, 2021

Bring girls back to the classroom - Article in Mid-day

Int’l Girl Child Day: Why it is urgent to bring girls at risk of dropping out back to the classroom

10 October 2021 |  Mumbai Mid-Day | Sarasvati T



Marriage, domestic work, digital gaps and disrupted income regularly push Indian girls away from formal learning. On the occasion of International Girl Child Day, and as schools and colleges reopen across the country, we look at ongoing efforts to bring girls back in touch with education



Stuti Yadav* from Malad Malwani, an underdeveloped area in suburban Mumbai, was made to leave school in 2017 and quickly married off by her father to someone in their village in Uttar Pradesh’s Jaunpur. Her mother, who has a hearing and speaking impairment, had no knowledge of this. “I did not want to drop out. I had just passed my ninth grade and wanted to study further,” says the 21-year-old, who was 17 at the time.


“I resisted initially but my father started crying and was scared I would run away with someone like my elder sister. I was of the view that my father cares about me and would have planned the best for me. My mother was shocked when I returned,” she recalls. Yadav, now separated from her husband, is trying to find work and complete her education in the city.


As offline classes resume in a phased manner across several states in India, bringing children—especially girls—who have lost touch with education back into schools will be a priority for education rights activists, community volunteers and government authorities. Nearly 42 percent of females, from age 3 to 35 years, were currently not attending educational institutions, according to data collected by the National Statistical Office (NSO) between July 2017 and June 2018.


The problem has worsened during the pandemic. The socio-economic impact of lockdown disconnected a large number of learners across India, specifically those who belonged to underprivileged sections of society, from formal education. UNESCO estimates hold that school closures due to Covid-19 have affected 320 million learners in India from pre-primary to secondary levels of education. Girls accounted for 141 million, or 41 percent, of those affected.


In the state of Maharashtra, ever since the pandemic, a total of 2,399 children—including 1,129 boys and 1,270 girls—have dropped out of school, according to data provided by Child Rights and You (CRY). CRY says it has managed to re-enroll a little over half of them — 638 boys and 702 girls.


Mandar Shinde, member of Pune-based child rights network Action for Rights of Children (ARC), says many girl students in their area of jurisdiction are still registered in schools but have stopped attending classes, and hence are not considered ‘dropouts’ yet. He adds that it is too soon to estimate the number of actual dropouts over the year.


With an increasing digital divide and unequal access to resources, gender disparities are widening across all levels of education. Additionally, a surge in child marriages—the National Crime Records Bureau found such cases jumped 50 percent from 523 in 2019 to 785 in 2020—is also contributing to more and more girls dropping out of school and college education.


The burden of child marriage


UNICEF estimates find that at least 1.5 million girls under 18 get married in India each year. Marriage is the major reason why 13.2 percent of enrolled females—12.4 percent in rural areas and 15 percent in urban—do not currently attend any educational institution. This is as per the NSO data cited above.


In Yadav’s case, she was promised that she would be allowed to study further after marriage but what followed within months was pressure to conceive a child, domestic violence and harassment by an alcoholic husband which finally led to the couple’s separation.


For Yadav, the separation meant the end of a tormenting year, making her a little hopeful. She returned to Mumbai last year and despite societal and family pressure to marry again, plans to educate herself and her siblings.


“I have decided to study further with my own money and my father has agreed. I want to earn and take care of my family as well,” she says, adding that she will be applying to take the tenth standard exam privately next year. While her younger siblings are still engaged in formal school education and managing to attend online school classes, Yadav is currently on the lookout for jobs to support them and herself.


ARC’s Shinde says at this point, his organisation’s focus is on bringing such children back to school by tracking them and assisting them with resources. “If we receive cases of a girl child marriage, we try to stop it. But if we cannot, the state Child Welfare Committee takes up the cause of rehabilitation of children who are married off.”


Aspirations vs domestic expectations


According to the NSO data, as of 2018, 32 percent of females in rural areas and 27 percent in urban areas, were not attending education in 2018 because of domestic work.


“My elder daughter had to drop out of school in seventh class because of my deteriorating relationship with my wife. She had to leave school and take care of younger siblings and other chores at home,” says Suhas Chavan, who works as a housekeeper at a private company in Pune.


Chavan’s daughter Raksha*, who used to study in a municipal school, has since been at home dealing with the family crisis, with no opportunities available to study further or learn new skills. Completing her education and getting a job are uphill challenges for the 15-year-old.


“I want to enroll her again in school but the situation at home does not allow that. How will she study now when she cannot learn the English language quickly or remember anything that she has learnt? And I don’t want her to work. We can manage ourselves financially,” her father says.


Raksha’s three younger sisters have continued to attend online classes on one phone that Chavan bought during the pandemic. He says the three will go to school once offline classes begin for their age groups.


Both Yadav and Chavan’s eldest daughter were forced to put aside aspirations and compromise their independence to shoulder household responsibilities at a tender age.


How digital gaps hurt


For 17-year-old Almas Khan’s younger sister, who is studying in Class 7 at a Municipal school in Malad Malwani, attending online class every day was a task as the family did not have enough money to spend on internet services or mobile data.


“There was only one phone and three people to study. My sister used to visit her friend’s house to study but even that could not last for a long time. My father cannot work since he was grievously injured in an accident. In that case, paying for mobile data is a privilege,” says Khan, who herself is grappling with finances to secure admission in a first year bachelor of commerce (BCom) course in a nearby college.


Khan fears that her younger sister will have to leave school after passing seventh class, the final level of upper primary municipal school. The fear, she says, is valid, given that she was forced to quit school after tenth class, due to financial constraints.


In 2019, she managed to resume Class 11 studies at a night college with financial assistance from teachers, a few debts and small scale jobs at home. Lockdown hit during her first year final exams, and like her younger sister, she too attended online classes with her friends and cleared the 12th class board exams with 76.5 percent.


According to the Centre for Budget and Governance Ability (CBGA), only 33 percent of women in India had access to the internet, in contrast to 67 percent of men. Further, the NSO data reveals that only 24 percent of Indian households have an internet facility.


According to Shinde, most of the children from marginalised communities were attending government schools so education and related entitlements were available for free up to the seventh or eighth standard. The pandemic disrupted this system with online classes and lack of access to digital infrastructure pushed children from marginalised communities, especially girls, out of school.


Ongoing efforts and scope for action


Mumbai’s Zarin Khan, community organiser at Nakshatra Network which works for girls’ education and health, says she and her colleagues have been constantly visiting girls who are willing to get back to school and convincing their parents to re-enroll them. According to Khan, the group has managed to re-admit six girls this year to school or college and is currently in touch with 35 more girls in the Malad Malwani area.


“We have also been gathering groups of girls and allowing them to study together since there are a limited number of phones,” Khan adds.


Education rights volunteers believe there is not much that they can do if the families have shifted to their native places after losing their source of income in cities during the lockdown.


When asked how schools can help bridge the gap between the number of girls enrolled and those attending online or offline classes, Shinde states that schools must first get in touch with local authorities such as Zilla Parishads or Municipal Corporations to identify vulnerable groups of children and ensure that they are attending school.


Second, schools must provide basic necessary facilities such as transport, books and uniforms to such children at the earliest. “Finally, schools must declare out-of-school and dropout cases as an educational emergency as any child left out of school is a potential victim of child marriage or child labour,” Shinde adds.


Organisations have also been conducting classes to help children work on their basic skills and recover from learning losses.


According to Nilendu Kumar, General Manager, Development Support of CRY, volunteers are also conducting bridge classes, where they take language, maths and science lessons, for children from marginalised communities in rural and urban areas, to ensure they are smoothly integrated into the offline system.


Says Kumar: “Children have faced a loss of education for more than one and a half years. This has been the biggest casualty. In the case of girls, if you have to prevent them from getting married underage, you have to ensure that you connect them to education in some or the other way.”


(*Names of all the girls have been changed to protect their identity)


https://www.mid-day.com/lifestyle/culture/article/intl-girl-child-day-why-it-is-urgent-to-bring-girls-back-to-the-classroom-23195907




Share/Bookmark

Sunday, June 20, 2021

NEP, SARTHAQ, and RTE Act

Date: 20/06/2021


A Critique on SARTHAQ
with respect to RTE Act 2009



Background


    The Ministry of Education (formerly the Ministry of Human Resource Development), Government of India, released a draft of a new National Education Policy in 2019. Multiple consultations were held by several civil society organisations, networks like Right To Education Forum, and other institutes, to discuss the impact of proposed education policy and suggest changes based on their experience, study, and analysis of the draft. The 484 page long draft was quite elaborative and spoke about restructuring of the Indian education system at all levels, right from early childhood education up to higher education and research.
 
    The official draft released in May 2019 explicitly recommended extension of the Right To Education Act. It was mentioned in the Chapter No. 3 that “The ‘free and compulsory’ aspect of the RTE Act must be enforced, and extended through Grade 12 and to all children up to the age of 18.” However, in another copy made available in October 2019, it was mentioned in section 3.3 that “The ‘free and compulsory’ aspect of the RTE Act will be examined for extension through Grade 12 and to all children up to the age of 18.” By December 2019, there was another copy circulated with the above statement in section 3.3 changed as “For providing equitable and quality education until Grade 12 to all children up to the age of 18, suitable facilitating systems shall be put in place.” Finally, in the official copy of National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, the statement appears as - “For providing equitable and quality education from the Foundational Stage through Grade 12 to all children up to the age of 18, suitable facilitating systems shall be put in place.”

NEP, SARTHAQ, and RTE

    The implementation plan for National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 was declared by the Ministry in the form of a document named SARTHAQ (Students’ and Teachers’ Holistic Advancement Through Quality Education). SARTHAQ links each recommendation of NEP with 297 Tasks along with responsible agencies, timelines and 304 outputs of these Tasks. There are two parts of the SARTHAQ document - Part 1 describing the tasks in detail along 276 pages and Part 2 (156 pages) providing chapter-wise, organisation-wise and year-wise task tables along with guidelines and frameworks for implementation. While it is advisable to read and understand the entire implementation plan, some of the tasks specifically targeting / impacting the Right To Education Act are discussed below.

Chapter 3 - Curtailing Dropout Rates and Ensuring Universal Access to Education at All Levels

3.4 Implementation Plan

Task 68: Alternative and innovative education centres will be put in place by States/UTs (after the amendment in Section 2(n) of the RTE Act) in cooperation with community, civil society, etc. to ensure that children of migrant laborers and other children who are dropping out of school due to various circumstances are brought back into mainstream education. (Timeline: 2024-25)


Comments:

    According to section 3 (1) of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, "Every child of the age of six to fourteen years shall have a right to free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till completion of elementary education."

    According to section 6 of this act, "For carrying out the provisions of this act, the appropriate Government and the local authority shall establish, within such area or limits of neighbourhood, as may be prescribed, a school, where it is not so established, within a period of three years from the commencement of this Act."

    Any alternative and innovative education centres (as mentioned in the SARTHAQ Task 68) go against the provisions of the RTE Act as according to Section 9 (k) of the RTE Act, "Every local authority shall ensure admission of children of migrant families."

    It appears that the government has failed to bring all out-of-school children to the schools, hence trying to adopt the model of non-formal education (designed and run by non-governmental organisations in response to specific needs and challenges) instead of focusing on universalisation of and improved access to education.

Chapter 16 - Implementation

16.3 Implementation Plan

Task 295: The implementation plan for NEP would certainly require amendments in certain sections of the RTE Act, 2009 (which is the vehicle for elementary education) for its smooth implementation. This task will be undertaken immediately by initiating consultations and discussions, followed by finalising the draft amendment and taking to the Legislature. (Timeline: 2021-23)


Comments:

    The strongest and most urgent demand regarding amendment in the RTE Act has always been its extension to cover education of all children up to 18 years of age. Even the Draft NEP had clearly recommended such an extension, which was later removed from the final NEP document. However, the NEP implementation guide SARTHAQ directly aims at amendments in certain sections of the RTE Act for smooth implementation in regards with non formal models and privatisation of education.

• The sections of the RTE Act need amendment as follows:
o Section 2 (n): Where the definition of school has been defined, alternate model of schools as mentioned in NEP are required to be added.
o Section 3: A child with disability referred to in sub-clause to be in line with the RPwD Act, 2016 which emphasizes on adapting the disabilities covered as per the Schedule of Disabilities mentioned in the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016.
o Section 23: Qualifications for appointment and terms and conditions of service of teachers to acquire ECCE qualifications with minimal disruption to their current work.
o Section 31 and 32: Monitoring of child’s right to education which need to be realigned with the roles and responsibility of Counsellors and safety and security of children.
o Section 21 and 22: School Management Committee and School Development Plan for realigning the roles and responsibilities of School Complex Management Committees (SCMC) in preparing school development plan in the context of school complexes/clusters.
o Section 25: Review of Pupil Teacher Ratio (PTR)


Comments:

     The definition of a school under section 2 (n) of the RTE Act 2009 includes schools established, owned, controlled by the government, as well as wholly or partially aided and unaided schools. Section 19 (1) states that "No school shall be established, or recognised unless it fulfills the norms and standards specified in the Schedule." The Schedule specifies the Norms and Standards for a School defined under section 2 (n), which include Pupil Teacher Ratio as well as infrastructural norms and standards such as separate toilets for boys and girls, safe and adequate drinking water facility, playground, boundary wall, library, play material, games and sports equipment, etc. All of these are included in the right of every child to free and compulsory education. The alternate model of schools to be added in the definition will not certainly follow these norms and standards, depriving the majority of students of their rightful access to these facilities required for their overall growth and development.

    School Management Committee and School Development Plan have their own significance with respect to proper functioning and development of any school. However, even after ten years of RTE Act implementation, the School Management Committees have not been established or functional or empowered in all schools. Instead of empowering existing School Management Committees, the NEP and SARTHAQ talk about introducing School Complex Management Committees which might not work as desired or might work in conflict with the best interest of children at standalone schools. No research and pilot projects have been worked upon related to establishment and functioning of school complexes. Without any data or experience or examples to support the model, School Complexes are being forcefully introduced in the NEP, overlooking urgent needs of the existing schools in both rural and urban areas.

    Other amendments proposed in the sections 3, 23, 31, 32, and 25 should be discussed and evaluated by involving concerned stakeholders such as organisations working with children with special needs, teachers’ associations, early childhood care and education experts, etc.

• The other major focus areas of the implementation plan, which need to be included in the RTE Act include:
o To allow alternative models of education (the requirements for schools to be made less restrictive enabling open school courses equivalent to class 3,5 and 8 (b) establishment of school complexes/clusters,
o Curriculum and evaluation procedure by emphasizing on holistic report card
o Other models for schools will also be piloted, such as philanthropic-public partnerships
o Standard-setting/regulatory framework and the facilitating systems for school regulation, accreditation, and governance


Comments:

    The section 30 (1) of the RTE Act specifies that "No child shall be required to pass any Board examination till completion of elementary education." Allowing open school courses equivalent to class 3, 5, 8 would certainly involve external exams violating every child's right to continue education till completion of 8th standard as per RTE Act 2009. The open school model also deprives the children of their right to access all necessary infrastructure at schools, including the playground, library, midday meal, etc. Experience with existing schools under philanthropic-public partnerships must have been considered before recommending inclusion of this model through proposed amendments in the RTE Act.

Chapter 17 - Mode of Implementation: Samagra Shiksha, Mid-day Meal, Adult Education

17.2 Background Of Existing Schemes

I. Samagra Shiksha

The Department has undertaken various new initiatives to bring reforms in the school eco system.

3) The RTE (Amendment) Act, 2019 amending the no detention policy of the RTE Act, 2009 has been enacted by Parliament and notified on 11.1.2019. Under this, if a student fails in second attempt, he/she can be detained in Class 5 or 8 or both, or the State can decide not to detain the child. This will pave the way for improvement in learning outcomes of children.


Comments:

     The No Detention Policy was amended in the Parliament in 2019, but the implementation was left to the States. The No Detention Policy was a very thoughtful provision under the RTE Act, encouraging and ensuring every child to complete elementary education or at least access all the rightful entitlements related to education. The NEP implementation guide SARTHAQ makes this objectionable statement that detaining a child in Class 5 or 8 or both will pave the way for improvement in learning outcomes of children. The No Detention Policy has been misinterpreted by the implementation agencies as a No Exams Policy or a Free Pass Policy. In fact, the RTE Act emphasizes on Continuous Comprehensive Evaluation of the children throughout the year, which should help the teachers understand the learning progress of every child on an ongoing basis instead of periodic exams that are designed to fail and detain and discourage children from learning. Given the challenging situations across the country, especially for girls, and looking at the dropout rates over the years, the No Detention Policy must be strongly backed. No study or research has ever shown that failing or detaining a child improves learning outcomes at any level of the education system. Instead of focusing on improving infrastructure and quality of teaching, the NEP and SARTHAQ are trying to blame the child for not learning. This statement and approach towards education must be strongly objected to at all levels, advocating for continuation of the No Detention Policy in the States.

Conclusion:

     This document covers some of the tasks in the NEP implementation guide SARTHAQ, that specifically target or impact the Right To Education Act. It is advisable to read and understand the entire implementation plan from the perspective of universalisation of education and ensuring access to quality education for every child up to 18 years of age. Efforts should be made to create awareness about the proposed amendments in the RTE Act and their impacts on education of children from socioeconomically deprived communities, including girls across the country. Any amendments in the Act must be well discussed upon and opinions and experiences of researchers, educationists, experts, child rights activists, etc. must be taken into consideration. No child should be deprived of its right to free and compulsory education along with all necessary entitlements as well as its right to protection, participation, and development.

 




Share/Bookmark

Saturday, June 5, 2021

Learning Loss due to Covid

 

Suggestions to avoid learning loss in Primary Education



  • Conduct a survey of out-of-school and dropout children (along with 6 year old children to be enrolled in the 1st standard) with the help of Anganwadi workers, Aadhaar data, birth records with the local administration, etc. Ensure all children are covered for education in the next academic year, irrespective of reopening of schools.

 

  • Ensure delivery of textbooks to all children across the state within the month of June. Get help from the Indian Post or private logistics partners.

 

  • Distribute workbooks to students across the state and ensure periodic distribution and collection of completed workbooks so that the teachers will have written records of learning assessment of the children, which can further be used for annual evaluation.

 

  • The District Institute of Education Training (DIET) Pune has launched a Learning Loss Recovery Programme (LLRP). Ensure quick and effective implementation of this programme across the state.

 

  • The LLRP provides guidelines for the teachers and parents to continue education of the children in case the schools do not reopen or partially reopen in the next academic year. The programme suggests involving educated parents and community youth as volunteers to support the parents in educating their children. Local NGOs can be involved in training and coordinating with the volunteers for conducting educational activities for the children in the communities. However, the government should seriously think of paying these volunteers instead of expecting charity at community level.

 

  • Check the option of setting up Satellite Centres in the communities, where 10 to 15 students can gather to use internet connection, computers, tablets, books, and other teaching learning material for online and offline education. These Satellite Centres can be connected to the nearby Government schools. The teachers can periodically visit these centres for guidance and evaluation. Community volunteers and/or facilitators among the parents can conduct a few activities here according to the schedule prepared and declared by the school.

 

  • We have used BALA - Building As a Learning Aid concept to enhance the learning process of the child. Can we develop a similar concept CALA - Community As a Learning Aid, where public properties, walls, temples, parks, buses, etc. can be used for the purpose of learning?

 

  • Ensure implementation of the mid-day meal programme for all the children irrespective of reopening of the schools in the next academic year.



Submitted by: Mandar Shinde

Convener, Action for the Rights of the Child (ARC) Pune

Mobile: 9822401246

Email: shindemandar@yahoo.com

Website: https://childrightspune.blogspot.com

Date: 04/06/2021











Share/Bookmark

Sunday, April 25, 2021

Education in Corona Times

 

(Click on the image to read)

शैक्षणिक नियोजन
- मंदार शिंदे
(महाराष्ट्र टाइम्स, २५ एप्रिल २०२१)

यंदाही शाळा वेळेवर, म्हणजे १५ जूनला, सुरू होणार नाहीत असे गृहीत धरून आत्ताच नियोजन करावे लागेल. त्या दृष्टीने खालील मुद्द्यांवर विचार, चर्चा, आणि कृती व्हावी.

(१) पुढील इयत्तांची पटनोंदणी कशी करावी याचे नियोजन करावे लागेल. पुढे आलेल्या मुलांची नावे शाळेकडे आहेतच; परंतु शाळाबाह्य मुलांच्या सर्वेक्षणात सापडलेली मुले, करोना काळात पालकांसोबत स्थलांतर होऊन गेलेली किंवा आलेली मुले, वयानुरुप पहिल्या इयत्तेमध्ये प्रवेश घेणारी मुले, यांना विचारात घेऊन पटनोंदणीचे नियोजन करावे. त्यासाठी शाळेतील शिक्षकांनी गृहभेटी कराव्यात का? शक्य असेल तिथे, पालकांशी फोनवरून संपर्क साधता येईल का? मुलांची माहिती मिळवण्यासाठी शासनाच्या इतर विभागांची मदत घेता येईल का? उदाहरणार्थ, जन्म-मृत्यू नोंदी, अंगणवाडी, रेशनिंग आणि आधार डेटा, इत्यादी. या पर्यायांची चाचपणी व्हावी.

(२) चालू शैक्षणिक वर्षात राज्य मंडळाने आणि शिक्षकांनी पाठ्यपुस्तके मुलांपर्यंत पोहोचवली. मुलांना शाळेत येणे शक्य नसेल अशा ठिकाणी ती घरपोच केली. आता पाठ्यपुस्तके मुलांपर्यंत कशी पोहोचवता येतील? यावेळी पूर्वनियोजन आणि इतर शासकीय विभाग (उदाहरणार्थ, पोस्ट खाते) यांच्या माध्यमातून जलद आणि खात्रीशीर वितरण करता येईल का?

(३) पुढील वर्षी मुले प्रत्यक्ष शाळेत येण्याचे प्रमाण कमी राहील, असे गृहीत धरून, पालक आणि/किंवा गाव-वस्ती पातळीवर शिक्षण सहायक किंवा स्वयंसेवक यांची निवड व सक्षमीकरण असा कार्यक्रम राबवता येईल का? नवीन राष्ट्रीय शैक्षणिक धोरणात 'पायाभूत साक्षरता आणि अंकज्ञान' यासंबंधी वस्ती पातळीवरील साक्षर स्वयंसेवकांचा सहभाग घ्यायचे सुचवले आहे. पाठ्यपुस्तकांमध्ये शिक्षकांसाठी सूचना असतात तशा पालक/स्वयंसेवक यांच्यासाठी सूचना (सुलभकाच्या भूमिकेतून) समाविष्ट करता येतील का? स्वयंसेवकांकडून विना-मोबदला कामाची अपेक्षा करण्याऐवजी, वस्तीमधील सुशिक्षित बेरोजगार तरुण-तरुणींना अर्धवेळ रोजगाराची संधी देता येईल का?

(४) वस्तीपातळीवर आठ-दहा-पंधरा मुले एकत्र येऊन काही कृती करू शकतील अशी उपकेंद्रे (सॅटेलाईट सेंटर) सुरू करता येतील का? अशा ठिकाणी इंटरनेट कनेक्शन, कॉम्प्युटर, स्क्रीन, पुस्तके, अशी काही साधने शाळेमार्फत उपलब्ध झाल्यास ऑनलाईन शिक्षणाची व्याप्ती व परिणाम वाढेल. अशा उपकेंद्रांवर शिक्षकांनी ठराविक दिवशी काही उपक्रम राबवावेत, मूल्यमापन करावे. इतर दिवशी सुलभक (फॅसिलिटेटर) यांच्या माध्यमातून शिक्षण सुरू ठेवता येईल. विशेषतः वस्तीमधील दहावी-बारावीच्या विद्यार्थ्यांसाठी शिक्षक/स्वयंसेवक यांच्या माध्यमातून मार्गदर्शनाची सोय अशा सॅटेलाईट सेंटरवर करता येईल.

(५) चालू शैक्षणिक वर्षात काही शिक्षक आणि स्वयंसेवी संस्थांनी राबवलेला प्रत्यक्ष कार्यपत्रिकेचा (ऑफलाईन वर्कशीटचा) प्रयोग अभ्यासून सर्वत्र राबवता येईल का? वर्कशीटमुळे मुलांचे ऑनलाईन अवलंबन कमी होऊ शकेल, तसेच विद्यार्थ्यांकडून वर्षभर लेखी स्वरूपात साहित्य जमा होत गेल्याने मूल्यमापनासाठी शिक्षकांना मदत होईल. वर्कशीटचे वितरण, संकलन यासाठी आतापासून नियोजन करता येईल का? पोस्ट किंवा खाजगी कुरियर कंपन्या, अमेझॉनसारख्या ई-कॉमर्स कंपन्यांचे जाळे वापरता येईल का?

(६) यंदा सगळे उपक्रम, मैदानी खेळ व कला विषयांकडे पुरेसे लक्ष देता आले नाही. पुढील वर्षामध्ये या गोष्टी कशा राबवणार याचे पर्यायी नियोजन करता येईल का? शाळा आणि शिक्षक यांच्याशिवाय शासकीय आणि सामाजिक घटकांचा वापर करून घेता येईल? स्थानिक उद्याने आणि खेळाची मैदाने, खाजगी क्रीडा प्रशिक्षण संस्था, यांच्याशी समन्वय साधून मुलांना सुरक्षित आणि नियमित सुविधा देता येतील का?

(७) मार्च २०२२ मध्येही दहावी-बारावीची सार्वत्रिक परीक्षा घेता येणार नाही असे गृहीत धरून नियोजन करता येईल का? यासाठी राज्य मंडळाकडून तिमाही मूल्यमापनाचे प्रश्नसंच देता येतील का? बोर्डाकडून हे प्रश्नसंच शाळांना नियमितपणे पाठवले, तर विद्यार्थी शाळेत जाऊन, सोशल डिस्टन्सिंग पाळून, तिमाही परीक्षा देऊ शकतील आणि शाळेतून एकत्रितपणे उत्तरपत्रिका बोर्डाकडे पाठवण्याची सोय करता येईल. अर्थात, यासाठी शाळा किंवा सॅटेलाईट सेंटरद्वारे पुरेसे मार्गदर्शन प्राप्त व्हायला हवे.

परीक्षा हवी की नको, सरसकट पुढील वर्गात प्रवेश द्यावा की नाही, या विषयावरील चर्चा आता थांबवून, पुढील शैक्षणिक वर्षाचे नियोजन करावे. यात शिक्षणाच्या नवीन माध्यमांचा विचार प्रामुख्याने व्हावा. उदाहरणार्थ, 'बिल्डींग ऐज अ लर्निंग एड' या 'बाला' संकल्पनेच्या धर्तीवर 'कम्युनिटी ऐज अ लर्निंग एड' अशा ('काला'?) संकल्पनेवर काम करता येईल का? फक्त पाठ्यपुस्तकातूनच नव्हे, तर शाळेची इमारत, परिसर, वस्तू, यांच्या माध्यमातून मुले काहीतरी शिकू शकतील अशा प्रकारे शाळेच्या भिंती आणि परिसर रंगवण्यात आले, मजकूर नोंदवण्यात आला. आता मुले वस्तीमध्येच राहणार असतील तर, सार्वजनिक भिंती, शासकीय इमारती, मंदिरे, उद्याने, झाडे, बसेस, रिक्षा, अशा सर्व ठिकाणी मुलांच्या शिक्षणाच्या दृष्टीने काही मजकूर/साहित्य उपलब्ध करता येईल का? घंटागाडी आणि प्रचारासाठी वापरल्या जाणाऱ्या रिक्षा, तसेच धार्मिक स्थळांवरील ध्वनिक्षेपक यंत्रणेचा मुलांच्या शिक्षणासाठी वापर करता येईल का?

वरील सर्व सूचना वैयक्तिक अनुभव आणि विचारातून मांडलेल्या आहेत. तज्ज्ञ, अनुभवी, आणि अधिकारी व्यक्तींनी योग्य तो बदल, चर्चा, कार्यवाही करावी. करोनावर नियंत्रण प्राप्त होऊन परिस्थिती पूर्ववत झाली तर चांगलेच आहे, पण तसे न झाल्यास, आणखी एक वर्ष (किंवा पुढील काही वर्षे) मुलांच्या शिक्षणाचा बळी जाऊ नये!

(लेखक पुण्यातील बालहक्क कृती समितीचे संयोजक आहेत.)

https://maharashtratimes.com/maharashtra/mumbai-news/parents-discussion-on-what-changes-are-expected-in-the-teaching-method-due-to-covid-19-situation/amp_articleshow/82241330.cms



Share/Bookmark

Wednesday, March 3, 2021

Special Drive for Education in Maharashtra

An Appeal to the parents, citizens, and social organizations…


The Government of Maharashtra has launched a special drive to bring all children up to 18 years of age in the main stream of education. For this, all the primary, secondary, higher secondary school teachers as well as Anganwadi workers are conducting a door-to-door survey to find out children not enrolled in or not attending any Anganwadi, Balwadi, or any kind of school.


If you spot any child between 3 and 18 years of age around you, who should be enrolled in or attending a school, or children living at the construction sites, or on footpaths, or children begging at traffic signals, or children of sugarcane workers and brick kiln workers, then please visit your nearby Corporation school or Zilla Parishad school and report about these children.


Remember, every child never enrolled in a school, or dropped out of school, or temporarily migrated, or left out of school due to recent Covid crisis should also be included in this survey. Efforts to bring these children back to school can be planned accordingly.


Also, a ward-level or village-level committee has been formed under this special drive. As a voluntary organization or as an educationist, you can get involved in the functioning of this committee working under the chairmanship of your local Corporator or Sarpanch.


Let’s come together and help every child get its right to education!



पालक, नागरिक, आणि स्वयंसेवी संस्थांना आवाहन…


१८ वर्षे वयापर्यंतच्या सर्व मुला-मुलींना शिक्षणाच्या प्रवाहात आणण्यासाठी महाराष्ट्र शासनाने एक विशेष मोहिम सुरु केली आहे. अंगणवाडी, बालवाडी, किंवा पहिली ते बारावीपर्यंत शाळेत जाऊ न शकणारी मुले शोधून त्यांना जवळच्या शाळेत दाखल करण्यासाठी ही मोहिम सुरु आहे. यासाठी सर्व शाळांमधील प्राथमिक, माध्यमिक, उच्च-माध्यमिक शिक्षक, तसेच अंगणवाडी सेविका व मदतनीस घरोघरी जाऊन अशा शाळाबाह्य मुलांची माहिती गोळा करीत आहेत.


तुमच्या आजूबाजूला, तुमच्या बघण्यात जर अशी ३ ते १८ वर्षांची मुले असतील, किंवा बांधकाम साईटवर राहणारी, फुटपाथवर राहणारी, रस्त्यावर सिग्नलला भीक मागणारी, ऊसतोडणी किंवा वीटभट्टी मजुरांची मुले किंवा वस्ती तुम्हाला माहिती असतील तर जवळच्या महानगरपालिकेच्या किंवा जिल्हा परिषदेच्या शाळेमध्ये त्यांची माहिती जरूर कळवा.


लक्षात घ्या, कधीही शाळेत न गेलेली, शाळा अर्धवट सोडलेली, तात्पुरते स्थलांतर झालेली, एवढेच नव्हे तर कोविड परिस्थितीमुळे शाळेत जाऊ न शकलेली मुलेसुद्धा यामध्ये नोंदवली जाणे गरजेचे आहे. त्यानुसार या मुलांना शाळेत दाखल करून घ्यायचे नियोजन करता येईल.


याशिवाय, तुमच्या वॉर्ड अथवा गाव पातळीवर यासाठी स्थानिक नगरसेवक किंवा सरपंच यांच्या अध्यक्षतेखाली एक समिती स्थापन झाली असेल. त्यामध्ये स्वयंसेवी संस्था किंवा शिक्षणतज्ज्ञ या नात्याने तुम्ही सहभागी होऊ शकता.


शोध दारोदारी । प्रबोधनाची फेरी ।

एक मूल न राही । शाळाबाह्य ॥







Share/Bookmark

Monday, October 12, 2020

Technology, Automation, and Creativity

 


टेक्नॉलॉजी, ऑटोमेशन, आणि आपली क्रिएटीव्हिटी

मंदार शिंदे 9822401246



सतराव्या शतकात इंग्लंडमधे थॉमस सेव्हरी नावाचा इंजिनिर वाफेच्या इंजिनाचं पेटंट मिळवण्यासाठी धडपड करत होता. त्यानंतर दीडशे वर्षांनी भारतात पहिली रेल्वे (मुंबई - ठाणे पॅसेंजर १८५३ साली) सुरु झाली. अमेरिकेत टी-ऐन्ड-टी कंपनीनं १९४६ साली मोबाई सेवा सुरु केली. त्यानंतर पन्नास वर्षांनी, ऑगस्ट १९९५ मधे पश्चिम बंगालचे तेव्हाचे मुख्यमंत्री ज्योती बसू यांनी भारतातला पहिला ‘मोबाईल' कॉल केला. ‘आयफोन सेव्हन’ अमेरिकेत सप्टेंबर २०१६ मधे लाँच झाल्यानंतर एका महिन्यात, म्हणजे ऑक्टोबर २०१मधे भारतात विक्रीसाठी उपलब्ध होता.

या तीन उदाहरणांतून आपल्या असं लक्षात येईल की भारताबाहेर, युरोप किंवा अमेरिकेत लागलेल्या शोधांचा भारतात प्रत्यक्ष उपयोग केला जाण्याचा वेळ झपाट्यानं कमी होतोय. वाफेच्या इंजिनाला दीडशे वर्षं, मोबाईल फोनला पन्नास वर्षं, आणि आता ‘आयफोन’सारख्या लेटेस्ट फोनला फक्त क महिना! का बाजूनं ही तंत्रज्ञानातली प्रगती आपल्याला सुखावत असली तरी, त्याची दुसरी बाजू समजून घेणंही तितकंच महत्त्वाचं आहे.

ज्या देशांमधे तंत्रज्ञान विकसित झालं, नवनवे शोध लागत गेले, त्या देशांची ती त्या-त्या वेळची गरज बनली होती. नवीन तंत्रज्ञान, नवीन उपकरणं प्रत्यक्ष वापरण्याआधी त्यापूर्वीचा टप्पा तिथल्या लोकांनी पार पाडला होता. त्यामुळं, नवनवीन उपकरणं हाताळण्यात एक प्रकारचा सराईतपणा आणि त्या टेक्नॉलॉजीचे फायदे-तोटे समजण्याची नैसर्गिक प्रगल्भता (मॅच्युरिटी) आपसूक विकसिझाली होती. भारतासारख्या देशात मात्र, फक्त जागतिकीकरण, प्रचंड मोठी बाजारपेठ, आणि माहितीच्या साधनांची उपलब्धता यांमुळं नवनवीन तंत्रज्ञान चक्क येऊन आदळत गेलं. त्यासाठी ‘मॅच्युर’ होण्याची सोडा, साक्षर होण्याचीसुद्धा संधी लोकांना मिळाली नाही. त्यामुळं जमेल तसा वापर करत आपण हा तंत्रज्ञानाचा विकास अंगावर घेत गेलो, घेत आहोत.

उदाहरणार्थ, पूर्वी घरामधे लॅन्डलाईन टेलिफोनसुद्धा सर्रास दित नसत. ज्यांच्या घरी किंवा ऑफीसमधे असे फोन होते, त्यांनी फोन वापराच्या काही सवयी किंवा मॅनर्स अंगी बाणवले होते. अशांच्या हातात मोबाईल फोन आले तेव्हा त्यांचा वापर बऱ्यापैकी मॅच्युअर्ड पध्दतीनं होत होता. पण ज्यांनी टेलिफोनच सोडा, कधी पोस्टानं पत्रसुद्धा पाठवलं नव्हतं, अशा लोकांच्या हातात थेट मोबाईल फोन आणि ई-मेल आल्यामुळं खरोगोंधळ माजलाय. या गोष्टींचे सगळे फायदे मान्य केले तरी त्याबरोबर होणारा गैरवापर आणि नुकसानसुद्धा दुर्लक्ष करण्याइतकं क्षुल्लक नाहीये, वढं नक्की.

हे उदाहरण अगदीच साधं होतं. प्रत्यक्षात मुद्दा असा आहे की, टेक्नॉलॉजी, विशेषतः ऑटोमेशन, हे उपलब्ध आहे म्हणून वापरायचं की गरज असेल तरच वापरायचं? ज्या देशात लोकसंख्या कमी आहे, त्यामुळं कुठल्याही इंडस्ट्रीत काम करण्यासाठी माणसं कमी मिळतात, किंवा कच्च्या मालापेक्षा मजुरीवर जास्त खर्च करावा लागतो, अशा ठिकाणी तंत्रज्ञान विकसित करण्यासाठी मोठी गुंतवणूक करून ऑटोमेशनचे पर्याय शोधून काढणं योग्य ठरेल. पण एकदा ऑटोमेशनचं तंत्र किंवा पर्याय उपलब्ध झाला की, जिथं त्याची फारशी गरज नसेल त्या देशात आणि उद्योगातसुद्धा ते वापरलं जातं. याला ‘पॅसिव्ह प्लिकेशन ऑफ टेक्नॉलॉजी’ म्हणता येईल.

उदाहरणार्थ, भारतात एवढ्या मोठ्या प्रमाणात तरूण बेरोजगार कुशल/अकुशल मनुष्यबळ उपलब्ध आहे. मग पन्नास-शंभर लोकांचं काम एकजण करू शकेल किंवा आपोआप होईल, अशा टेक्नॉलॉजीची आपल्याला गरज आहे का? सामाजिकदृष्ट्या अशी गरज नसली तरी, गुंतवणूकदारांच्या किंवा उद्योजकांच्या दृष्टीनं अशी गरज आहे. एक तर, ऑटोमेशनमुळं कुठल्याही उत्पादनाची गुणवत्ता वाढते आणि वेळही कमी लागतो. मॅन्युअल कामामधे व्यक्तींवर (त्यांचं कौशल्य, ताकद, स्वभाव, भावना, इच्छा, प्रकृती, इत्यादी अनेक गोष्टींवर) अवलंबून रहावं लागतं. ऑटोमेशनमुळंत्पादन प्रक्रियेवर मालकांचं नियंत्रण वाढतं. या वेगवान आणि गुणवत्तापूर्ण उत्पादनांसाठी खर्चही तुलनेनं कमी येतो. साहजिकच, धिक नियंत्रित आणि फायदेशीर व्यवसायाच्या दृष्टीनं ‘ऑटोमेशन’ ही उद्योजकांची गरज आहे. आणि आ जागतिकीकरण आणि माहिती तंत्रज्ञानामुळं हे सगळे पर्याय त्यांना सहज उपलब्धही आहेत.

आता ही परिस्थिती समजून घेतली तर, ऑटोमेशन अटळ आहे हे आपल्या लक्षात येईल. मग कामगारांच्या हितासाठी, सामाजिक समतेसाठी गैरे ऑटोमेशनला विरोध करून, आंदोलनंरून काहीही उपयोग नाही, हेसुद्धा आता आपण मान्य केलं पाहिजे. ज्या गोष्टीमुळं निश्चित फायदा होणार आहे (उदाहरणार्थ, ऑटोमेशन), ती गोष्टना उद्या इंडस्ट्रीत वापरायला सुरु होणार, हे जितक्या लवकर आपण मान्य करू तेवढं आपल्याच फायद्याचं राहील. सामाजिक/राजकीय दबाव आणून आपण या गोष्टी फार काळ टाळू शकणार नाही. मग त्यापेक्षा आपण जपासूनच तयारी ठेवणं उत्तम.

ही तयारी ठेवायची म्हणजे नक्की काय करायचं? आजपर्यंज्या उद्योगांमधे, कामांमधे ऑटोमेशन आल्यामुळं नोकरी-व्यवसायाच्या संधी कमी झाल्यात किंवा नाहीशा झाल्यात, त्या क्षेत्रांची माहिती तर आपल्याला आहेच. उदाहरणार्थ, बँकेमधे पूर्वी का दिवसात पाचशे कस्टमर फक्त कॅश काण्यासाठी येत होते. त्यांच्यासाठी सहा ते सात कॅशिर पूर्ण दिवसभर काउंटरमागे बसून राहत होते. आज एटीएम आणि कार्ड पेमेंटमुळं अशा कस्टमरची संख्या पाचशेवरून पन्नासवर आली आणि त्यासाठी एक कॅशियरसुद्धा पुरेसा आहे. आता कॅश काउंटर हाताळणारे इतर पाच-सहा लोक एका क्षणात बेरोजगार आणि (इतर कामांसाठी) अकुशल ठरले. इतरही जवळपास सर्व बँकांमधे ऑटोमेशन झाल्यामुळं त्यांना कॅशियरची नोकरी मिळणार नाही आणि इतर कामासाठी आवश्यक कौशल्यही त्यांच्याकडं असणार नाही.

या उदाहरणानुसार, इथून पुढं बँके कॅशिरच्या कामासाठी नोकरीच्या संधी कमी असणार, हे समजून त्यानुसार शिक्षण व कौशल्य विकासात बदल करणं आवश्यक आहे. पण ‘आज’ शाळा-कॉलेजात शिकणाऱ्या मुलांसाठी वढाच विचार पुरेसा नाही. त्यांना तर अशा कामांचा अंदाज आजच बांधायचा आहे, जी पुढच्या १०/५/२० वर्षांत ऑटोमेशनच्या आवाक्यात येऊन पूर्णपणे बदलतील.

असा अंदाज लावणं तशी सोपी गोष्ट नाही. गेल्या पन्नास-शंभर वर्षांमधे कित्येक अनपेक्षित कामं आणि क्षेत्रं ऑटोमेशनखाली आली आहेत. पण एक गोष्ट या सगळ्यांत समान दिसून येते. ती म्हणजे, वारंवार तेच-ते त्यापद्धतीनं केलेलं काम पकन ऑटोमे होऊ शकतं. उदाहरणार्थ, निरनिराळ्या कस्टमरनी जमा केलेले चेक किंवा स्लिप तपासून त्यांना त्यावर लिहिलेली रक्कम मोजून देणं, हॉटेल किंवा दुकानांमधे ग्राहकांच्या ऑर्डरप्रमाणं यादी बनवून हिशोब करणं, ठराविक डिझाईनच्या साचेबद्ध वस्तूंचं उत्पादन करणं, इत्यादी. ही उदाहरणं आज ऑटोमेशन झालेल्या क्षेत्रातली असली तरी त्यावरुन भविष्यात ऑटोमेशन होऊ शकणाऱ्या कामांचा अंदाज लावता येईल.

आज मोठ्या प्रमाणावर बीपीओ (बिझनेस प्रोसेस आऊटसोर्सिंग) क्षेत्रात व्हॉईस (कॉल सेंटर) आणि नॉन-व्हॉईस (डेटा एन्ट्री) स्वरुपाची कामं उपलब्ध आहेत. पण थोडा विचार केला त, ही दोन्ही प्रकारची कामं ऑटोमेशनखाली येऊ शकतात हे लक्षात येईल. कॉल करणाऱ्या व्यक्तीचा आवाज, शब्द, आणि अर्थ ओळखून प्रतिसाद देणारी ‘व्हॉईस रेकग्निशन सिस्टीम’ मार्केटमधे उपलब्ध आहेच. जास्तीत जास्त भाषा, बोलीभाषा, शब्दसंग्रह, वाक्यांची उदाहरणं, यांचा समावेश या टेक्नॉलॉजीमधे करण्यासाठी मोठ्या प्रमाणावर संशोधन आणि प्रयोग सुरू आहेत. अशीच डेव्हलपमें ‘ओसीआर’ (ऑप्टीकल कॅरेक्टर रेकग्निशन) तंत्रातसुद्धा होत आहे. टाईप केलेले जवळपास सगळे फॉन्ट आतापर्यंत ओसीआर टूलमधून वाचता येतात. शिवाय हातानं लिहिलेला मजकूरदेखील बऱ्यापैकी वाचून आपोआप टाईप करून मिळतो. (टीप - हा हस्तलिखित सात पानांचा लेख ‘ओसीआर’ टेक्नॉलॉजी वापरून थेट वर्ड फाईलमधे कन्व्हर्ट केलेला आहे. नंतर त्यामधे थोड्याफार दुरुस्ती/सुधारणा केलेल्या आहेत.) व्हॉईस रेकग्निशन आणि ओसीआर तंत्रामुळं व्हॉईस आणि नॉन-व्हॉईस प्रोसेसमधल्या नोकऱ्या कित्येक पटीनं कमी होणार, हे आपल्याला ओळखता आलं पाहिजे.

रस्त्यावर चौकाचौकात सिग्नलवर लावलेले कॅमेरे आणि त्यात काढलेल्या फोटोवरून थेट घरी येणारी नियमभंगाच्या दंडाची पावती, हे ट्रॅफीक पोलिसांच्या कामाचं ऑटोमेशन आहे. रजिस्टर्ड मोबाईल नंबरवरून फक्त एक आकडा दाबून घरगुती गॅस सिलिंडर बुक करता येण्याच्या सोयीमुळं गॅस एजन्सीतल्या नोकऱ्या कमी झाल्या आहेत. इंटरऐक्टीव्ह ई-लर्निंग सॉफ्टवेअर आणि टॅबलेट, तसंच गुगल आणि विकीपिडीया यांच्या सहज उपलब्धतेमुळं, दरवर्षी तेच-तेच धडे, त्याच-त्याच कविता, तीच-तीच प्रमेयं शिकवणाऱ्या शिक्षकांची गरजही भविष्यात कमी होत जाणार आहे. ‘ऑनलाईन’ आणि 'कॅशलेस’ या दोन संकल्पनांच्या वावटळीत कसुरी आणि पुन्हा-पुन्हा करायची कामं माणसांच्या हातून सुटून मशिन किंवा कॉम्प्युटरच्या पदरात जाऊन पडत आहेत, पडणार आहेत. त्यासाठीच्या संशोधन, प्रयोग, विकास, आणि प्रत्यक्ष अंमलबजावणीसाठी खाजगी उद्योगांइतकेच सरकारी क्षेत्रातही प्रयत्न आणि गुंतवणूक केलेली आपल्याला दिसून येईल.

आजच्या घडीला भारतात कुशल-अकुशल कामगारांचं प्रमाण ५ टक्के विरुद्ध ९५ टक्के इतकं व्यस्त आहे. त्यात नवनवीन तंत्रज्ञान आणि ऑटोमेशनची भर पडून, आजचे कुशल कामगार पटकन ‘अकुशल’ ठरत चाललेत. उद्या नोकरी शोधायला बाहेर पडलो तर काय ‘स्किल्स’ लागतील याचा आज अंदाज येत नाहीये. उद्या भारतात खादा ऑनलाईन बिझनेस सुरू केला, तर स्पर्धा अमेरिकेतल्या गुगल आणि फेसबुकशी असू शकेल. अगदी अगरबत्ती बनवायचा व्यवसाय सुरु केला तरी चीनशी स्पर्धा करण्याची तयारी ठेवावी लागेल, अशी परिस्थिती आहे.

मग आज शिक्षण घेत असलेल्या पुढच्या पिढीनं शिकायचं तरी काय? कशाकशाची तयारी त्यांनी करून ठेवायची? अशी कोणती कामं असतील, जी काही झालं तरी टोमेशनखाली येणार नाहीत? खरं तर आजच्या विद्यार्थ्यांपेक्षा आजच्या शिक्षकांपुढचं हे मोठं आव्हान आहे. वीस-पंचवीस वर्षांपूर्वी आपण जे शिकलो ते आजच कालबाह्य झालंय. मग अजून दहा-पंधरा वर्षांनी मार्केटमधे उतरणाऱ्या या मुलांना काय शिकवायचं, जे त्यांना त्यापुढची तीस-पस्तीस वर्षं टिकून राहायला आणि प्रगती करायला उपयोगी पडेल?

कॅलक्युलेटर आणि कॉम्प्युटरपासून गुगल मॅप्स आणि युट्यूबपर्यंत सगळी अद्ययावत साधनं आजच लीलया हाताळणाऱ्या या पिढीला काही शिकवायचंच असेल तर ते इतिहास, भूगोल, गणित, इंग्रजी, फिजिक्स, केमिस्ट्री, नक्कीच नाही! त्यांना शिकवायची आहे - दूध आणि पाणी वेगळं करू शकणारी विचारपद्धती. त्यांना शिकवायची आहे - योग्य वेळी योग्य निर्णय घेण्याची युक्ती. त्यांना शिकवाची आहे - कुठल्या कामासाठी कुठलं तंत्रज्ञान वापरायचं आणि कुठलं वापरायचं नाही हे ओळखण्याची शक्ती. त्यांना शिकवायचं आहे - माणसांचं काम हलकं, सोपं, अचूक, आणि उपयुक्त होईल असं डिझाईन बनवण्याचं कौशल्य

‘क्रिटीव्हिटी’ या गोष्टीचं कधीच ‘ऑटोमेशन’ नाही होऊ शकणार. दिवसाला पाचशे गाड्या बनवणारी कंपनी ऑटोमेशन करुन दिवसाला दोन हजार गाड्या बनवू शकेल, पण कमीत कमी किंमतीची, जास्तीत जास्त ऐव्हरेज देणारी, शून्य प्रदूषण करणारी गाडी कशी बनवायची, हे कुठल्या तरी माणसालाच (किंवा माणसांच्या समूहाला) बसून, विचार करून ठरवावं लागेल. का मिनिटाका कागदाच्या दोनशे कॉपी काणारं मशिन मिळू शकेल, पण त्या कागदावर काय लिहायचं हे कुठल्या तरी सुपिक डोक्यातनंच यावं लागेल. या क्रिएटीव्हिटीला कधीही मरण नाही, कितीही ऑटोमेशन झालं तरी.

आता प्रश्न असा आहे की, अशी क्रिएटीव्हिटी सगळ्यांकडं कशी असणार? आणि असे क्रिएटीव्ह कामाची गरज असणारे जॉब कितीसे आणि कुठं असणार?

झालंय काय, गेल्या कित्येक वर्षांत झापडबंद शिक्षण आणि साचेबद्ध कामाच्या पद्धतींमुळं आपला सगळ्यांचाच स्वत:च्या क्रिएटीव्हिटीवरचा विश्वास उडाला. आपण हुशार असू शकतो, कष्टाळू असू शकतो, सिन्सियर आणि लॉय असू शकतो, पण आपण ‘क्रिएटीव्ह’ मात्र कदापि असू शकत नाही, असं आपल्याला ठामपणे वाटतं. क्रिएटीव्ह माणूस वेगळाच दिसतो; तो क्लीन-शेव्ह न करता दाढी वाढवतो, भांग पाडण्याऐवजी लांब केसांचा ‘पोनी’ बांधतो, फॉर्मल शर्टऐवजी लांब कुर्ते घालतो, आणि ऑफीस बॅगऐवजी ‘शबनम’ घेऊन फिरतो, असं काहीतरी आपल्याला वातं. (ही काल्पनिक लक्षणंसुद्धा क्रिएटीव्ह ‘पुरुषां’बद्दलचीच आहेत, कारण ‘क्रिएटीव्ह’ आणि 'बाई' या दोन गोष्टींची एकत्रित कल्पनासुद्धा करणं आपल्याला शिकवलेलं नाही.) त्यामुळंक्रिएटीव्हिटी’ या शब्दाची आपल्याला एकंदरीतच ऐलर्जी आहे.

प्रत्यक्षात, प्रत्येक मूल जन्मजात क्रिएटीव्हच असतं हे आपण विसरतोय. घरातून, शाळेतून, समाजातून ‘हे करू नकोस', 'तसं बोलू नकोस’, ‘असा विचारसुद्धा करू नकोस’, सं 'शिक्षण' आपण मुलांना देत असतो. हे शिक्षण देणं थांबवलं तर त्यांची क्रिटीव्हिटी आपोआप विकसित होत जाई आणि स्वतःच्या अस्तित्वासाठी आणि प्रगतीसाठी ते स्वतःच मार्ग शोधतील. त्यांना क्रिएटीव्हिटी ‘शिकवण्याच्या’ भानगडीत न पडणंच चांगलं! गेल्या काही पिढ्यांपासून आपण उत्पादन आकड्यांमधे आणि यश रुपयांमधे मोजायला इतके सरालो आहोत की, ता ही क्रिएटीव्हिटी कशात मोजायची हा यक्षप्रश्न आपल्यासमोर उभा ठाकेल. त्यापेक्षा आपण या मुलांची विचार करण्याची शक्ती, ऊर्मी, आणि चुकांमधून शिकण्याची धडपड, या गोष्टींना फक्त प्रोत्साहन देत राहिलं पाहिजे. उद्या आपली नोकरी टिकेकी नाही, याची खात्री नसलेल्यांनी मुलांच्या वीस वर्षांनंतरच्या करीयरमधे लुडबूड करणं थांबवलं पाहिजे. वेगवेगळ्या गोष्टी करून बघण्यासाठी, प्रयोगातून शिकण्यासाठी त्यांना पूरक वातावरण दिलं पाहिजे.

इतकी वर्षं औद्योगिकीकरणाच्या लाटेत वाहत आपण फक्त ठरवून दिलेल्या प्रोसेसप्रमाणं ‘प्रॉडक्शन’ करत राहिलो. आता या सगळ्या सिस्टीमचीच पुनर्रचना करण्याची वेळ आलीय, त्यामुळं सांगितलेलं काम करणाऱ्यांपेक्षा स्वत: विचार करून बदल घडवू शकणाऱ्यांना भविष्यात मोठी मागणी आणि खूप काम असणार आहे. माणसांच्या मुलभूत गरजा, जगण्याची क्वालिटी, या गोष्टींकडं दुर्लक्ष करत आपण लाखो-करोडो वस्तूंचं उत्पादन करत राहिलो आणि त्यालाच आयुष्याचं ध्येय मानत गेलो. आता ऑटोमेशनमुळं, हे उत्पादनाचं पुन्हा-पुन्हा करायचं तेच-तेच काम आपोआप परस्पर होत राहील आणि खरंखुरं क्रिएटीव्ह, उपयोगी, ‘मानवी’ काम करायला माणूस पुन्हा मोकळा होईल, अशी आशा बाळगायला हरकत नाही.



© मंदार शिंदे

०८/०७/२०१७

Mobile: 9822401246

E-mail: shindemandar@yahoo.com

Blog: http://aisiakshare.blogspot.com

Books: http://amazon.com/author/aksharmann



Share/Bookmark